Let's see, I think I remember that game. That's the one with the little horsey that moves in an L shape and can jump over other pieces, right? Bishops are the pointy headed guys that move diagonal, and rooks are those castle like things that move straight? The queen can move like the castle and pointy headed guy? The king...that's the piece that can't get captured? Then there's those round headed guys that cheat because they move one way and capture another way. Pawns? Okay I've got my games squared away.
Sometimes I feel like I've totally forgotten how to play chess. I know how the pieces move, but lately I just don't know what to do with them. Have I been overexposed to six year old kids that no matter how many times I tell them only knights can jump, still move bishops without moving any pawns? Maybe it's the kid who no matter how many times I tell him to move the e or d pawn first, insists on playing 1. h4 followed by 2. Rh2. I suppose it's fitting that I lost last night to someone who opened 1. a4. I think he really wanted to be black so he wasted a move to let me be "white". Not that I can blame him. The two games I played as white were just butt ass ugly. Maybe he figured he have an easier time against me if he just tossed the tempo and pretended to be "black". I didn't disappoint. I tossed the exchange on move 23, and by move 25 managed to turn my disadvantage into a full rook.
Right now I'm wrestling with what I want from chess. I've got some ideas. I think I finally figured out why I subject myself to trips to New City to get smashed by experts and A players on Thursday nights. More on my midnight musings on Metro North in my next post. Yes there will be a next post, and it won't take another 3 months for it to appear. I just wanted get a few words out to let people know, I am amongst the living.
Saturday, December 3, 2011
Friday, September 16, 2011
In Case You Were Wondering......
....where my blog posts on the US Open are, there aren't any. It's not because I didn't feel like writing about my usual US Open agony. There was no US Open agony because instead of agonizing over whether or not I should take a bye in round 7 after cramming in six games on Thursday and Friday, I was doing this....
Instead of spending Saturday and Sunday trapped inside sitting in delegates meetings I was doing this...
The only agonizing had been in May when I found out my Uncle Charlie's 90th birthday celebration was going to be the same weekend as the US Open. There really wasn't that much agonizing. Let's see.... Orlando, Florida or North Hatley, Canada in August? Let's see... Sitting in a hotel at the Orlando airport for 5 days playing chess and attending meetings, or spending 4 days at a charming inn in Canada on a beautiful lake hanging out with family and friends.
Yes dear readers, I do have a life outside of chess. The US Open comes around once a year. A 90th birthday only comes around once in the person's lifetime. That's assuming he or she lasts that long. Sadly I did not get to celebrate a 90th birthday for either of my parents, so when I still have relatives who reach that milestone it's worth traveling far away from the chess scene to celebrate with them.
In case you think this is just a filler piece while I work on my New York State Championship posts, let me set the record straight. You'll have to wait until 2012 at the earliest for my next report on the New York State Championship. That's because when I was in Canada with my sister, I decided I would spend Labor Day weekend in San Diego with her, instead of in her empty house in Albany while playing in the state championship.
This was the summer of all things not chess. I played at my club here and there. I made a token appearance at the Marshall for Thursday cracktion. Almost a year later I played Black against Scot Mc Elheny again. Although the result was the same, it was a much longer game. Maybe this should be filed under Freaky Friday.
SMcElheny-pw081111.pgn
Alas summer chess vacation is over. I direct my first scholastic tournament this weekend, and I start teaching my first chess classes next week. Last night I showed my face at the Marshall once again. I think they wondered if I was still alive. Rumors of my chess death are greatly exaggerated. Expect to see more blog posts as I try to figure out if I really can play this infernal game called chess.
Celebrating Uncle Charlie's 90th birthday
Instead of spending Saturday and Sunday trapped inside sitting in delegates meetings I was doing this...
Swimming in Lake Massiwhippy
And this...
Listening to jazz on Sunday afternoon.
The only agonizing had been in May when I found out my Uncle Charlie's 90th birthday celebration was going to be the same weekend as the US Open. There really wasn't that much agonizing. Let's see.... Orlando, Florida or North Hatley, Canada in August? Let's see... Sitting in a hotel at the Orlando airport for 5 days playing chess and attending meetings, or spending 4 days at a charming inn in Canada on a beautiful lake hanging out with family and friends.
In case you think this is just a filler piece while I work on my New York State Championship posts, let me set the record straight. You'll have to wait until 2012 at the earliest for my next report on the New York State Championship. That's because when I was in Canada with my sister, I decided I would spend Labor Day weekend in San Diego with her, instead of in her empty house in Albany while playing in the state championship.
This was the summer of all things not chess. I played at my club here and there. I made a token appearance at the Marshall for Thursday cracktion. Almost a year later I played Black against Scot Mc Elheny again. Although the result was the same, it was a much longer game. Maybe this should be filed under Freaky Friday.
SMcElheny-pw081111.pgn
Alas summer chess vacation is over. I direct my first scholastic tournament this weekend, and I start teaching my first chess classes next week. Last night I showed my face at the Marshall once again. I think they wondered if I was still alive. Rumors of my chess death are greatly exaggerated. Expect to see more blog posts as I try to figure out if I really can play this infernal game called chess.
Thursday, July 7, 2011
On the Road, but Not for Chess!
I leave shortly for Brussels in about an hour. No great chess plans on the agenda though one of my readers did give me a few suggestions of chess cafes. One I've been to on my last trip to Amsterdam, and I was not successful in getting any games. Maybe this time I'll have better luck if I visit there again.
A lot has happened in the chess world that I was not part of. I skipped this year's Thursday Night Action Championship. I was in no mood to deal with the angst of which section to play in. The previous Thursday got me fed up with chess. I realize I'm not going to improve until I do some work on my game. Right now I don't feel like working on my game. I have too much else going on. Read this post at my other blog and you'll understand.
The week before I went down to the Marshall for Thursday's 4 Rated Games Tonight! It had been a month since I last played down there. I figured I should show my face before people thought I had died. Since Josh and dad weren't going I had to take the train down to Grand Central and then catch the subway down to Greenwich Village. $5.95 for the train and $2.25 for the subway each way. On top of that there's the $25 entry fee. $16.40 + $25 = $41.40 for an evening of "entertainment".
My evening's entertainment featured getting smacked around in round 1 by a 2100. In between rounds I got into a bit of a heated discussion with a player who had dropped out a tournament at my club. I wasn't the director that night. When I run tournaments at my club I either play or don't play depending on whether it's odd or even. I can either put myself in if the number is odd or take myself out to keep it even. I was rather annoyed that he withdrew that night because it caused the number to be odd so someone got a bye. I was even more annoyed that it was him because I had put a rule in requiring players over 1900 to play all the rounds. I did that because this particular player ended out getting a bye in the last round when a kid took a bye in the last round. He was pissed off because he wanted to play all 3 rounds. I let him know that I did not like the fact that he dropped out of the tournament causing someone to get a bye.
He took offense at my criticizing him for dropping out. This was not the first time we've exchanged words under not such nice circumstances. So what happens? I have to play him in the next round. I hate when I have to play someone who I've had a dispute with. It just makes things a little uncomfortable. Outside of the perfunctory hand shake and "good luck" at the beginning nothing else was said. The game did not get off to a great start. I managed to lose the exchange early. However some how I managed to battle back and draw the game, but not before losing a piece. That part of the game did not get recorded because we both had seconds left on our clock.
Here's the game.
pw-by61611.pgn
I was happy to pull out the draw under those circumstances. Yes it would have been nice to beat the guy, but a draw against a higher rated player was also acceptable. Round 3 I got paired up again and lost. I was also paired up in round 4. That game was particularly annoying because the opponent gave up a pawn early. It didn't seem like he was getting any huge jump in development from the pawn gambit. In fact I felt I had an excellent position with passed a and b pawns. Somehow I let the position slip away and he got all kinds of counter play and went on to win.
Here is that game:
pw-JCuscianna61611.pgn
For $41.40 I got to lose three games, draw one, lose another 13 rating points and get into an argument. Who needs that crap? On the train ride back I realized that I'm making myself crazy with this kind of play. I'm making the same mistakes out of the opening and I'm missing simple tactics. Why do I need to do this to myself? Until I invest some time into my game things aren't going to change. The time limit isn't necessarily the issue. Many of the mistakes are coming before the clock is a factor.
I decided unless I'm getting a ride down to the Marshall I'm not going to play.
To be continued....
A lot has happened in the chess world that I was not part of. I skipped this year's Thursday Night Action Championship. I was in no mood to deal with the angst of which section to play in. The previous Thursday got me fed up with chess. I realize I'm not going to improve until I do some work on my game. Right now I don't feel like working on my game. I have too much else going on. Read this post at my other blog and you'll understand.
The week before I went down to the Marshall for Thursday's 4 Rated Games Tonight! It had been a month since I last played down there. I figured I should show my face before people thought I had died. Since Josh and dad weren't going I had to take the train down to Grand Central and then catch the subway down to Greenwich Village. $5.95 for the train and $2.25 for the subway each way. On top of that there's the $25 entry fee. $16.40 + $25 = $41.40 for an evening of "entertainment".
My evening's entertainment featured getting smacked around in round 1 by a 2100. In between rounds I got into a bit of a heated discussion with a player who had dropped out a tournament at my club. I wasn't the director that night. When I run tournaments at my club I either play or don't play depending on whether it's odd or even. I can either put myself in if the number is odd or take myself out to keep it even. I was rather annoyed that he withdrew that night because it caused the number to be odd so someone got a bye. I was even more annoyed that it was him because I had put a rule in requiring players over 1900 to play all the rounds. I did that because this particular player ended out getting a bye in the last round when a kid took a bye in the last round. He was pissed off because he wanted to play all 3 rounds. I let him know that I did not like the fact that he dropped out of the tournament causing someone to get a bye.
He took offense at my criticizing him for dropping out. This was not the first time we've exchanged words under not such nice circumstances. So what happens? I have to play him in the next round. I hate when I have to play someone who I've had a dispute with. It just makes things a little uncomfortable. Outside of the perfunctory hand shake and "good luck" at the beginning nothing else was said. The game did not get off to a great start. I managed to lose the exchange early. However some how I managed to battle back and draw the game, but not before losing a piece. That part of the game did not get recorded because we both had seconds left on our clock.
Here's the game.
pw-by61611.pgn
I was happy to pull out the draw under those circumstances. Yes it would have been nice to beat the guy, but a draw against a higher rated player was also acceptable. Round 3 I got paired up again and lost. I was also paired up in round 4. That game was particularly annoying because the opponent gave up a pawn early. It didn't seem like he was getting any huge jump in development from the pawn gambit. In fact I felt I had an excellent position with passed a and b pawns. Somehow I let the position slip away and he got all kinds of counter play and went on to win.
Here is that game:
pw-JCuscianna61611.pgn
For $41.40 I got to lose three games, draw one, lose another 13 rating points and get into an argument. Who needs that crap? On the train ride back I realized that I'm making myself crazy with this kind of play. I'm making the same mistakes out of the opening and I'm missing simple tactics. Why do I need to do this to myself? Until I invest some time into my game things aren't going to change. The time limit isn't necessarily the issue. Many of the mistakes are coming before the clock is a factor.
I decided unless I'm getting a ride down to the Marshall I'm not going to play.
To be continued....
Friday, June 24, 2011
Reflections on Deflection
I mentioned in my last post about my two wins in Fremont using the same tactic. In a rather different style of posting for me, I'm going to do an instructional post. Lately my games have been rather blah. I fumble through the opening, muddle through the middle game, and depending on how I survived the middle game, I may or may not been able to hold the position for a win or draw. It's been rather depressing to watch my games unfold in a similar pattern game after game. It's also been rather boring. I really need to shake up my chess if I want to get out of this rut I've been in. However at the moment I'm not overwhelmingly motivated to do so. Perhaps a separate post on life as a "Jack of all trades, master of none" is in order, but I digress.
For the entire month of April I did not play one single game of "cracktion". Every single game I played in April was at a time limit of G/85 or slower. I played in the Bob Peretz Chess Club Championship and the Westchester Chess Club Championship. The latter just finished a couple of weeks ago. Sad to say it was nothing like the 2009 championship. Losing rounds 5 and 6 to the two guys who who end out as co-champions did not help matters.
In mid-May I ventured down to the Marshall Chess Club for the weekly "cracktion" tournament. In the first round I was paired against IM Ilye Figler. This was my 13th game against him and like 11 of my previous encounters with him, I lost. My only draw with him was back in 1997. He got the IM title last year at the NY International at the tender age of 63. Yes there is hope for those who are not under rated little munchkins. I felt like I was holding my own out of the opening. However things fell apart after I played the rather insipid move of 15...c6. Looking back at the game I don't even remember why I played the move. Was I afraid of 16. d5? More to the point, was it one of those "I don't know what to do so I'll just make a random pawn move and see what happens" moments?
![]()
I totally missed 16. Bxh6! I chose not to play 16...gxh6 allowing 17. Rxf6. I felt if I was going to play down a pawn against an IM I should keep the pawns around my king somewhat intact so I opted to play 16...Nh5, a move that would have been better then c6. The game continued 17.Bf4 Nxg3 18.Bxg3 Rad8 19.Rae1 Bh5 20.e5 Bg6 21.Bxg6 Nxg6 22. e6 to reach the position below.
![]()
I guess I didn't get quite get the tactical idea of deflection down the first time so I foolishly accepted the pawn he offered. 22...fxe6? 23.Qxg6 Qd5 24.Be5 Rd7 25.Rxf8+ Kxf8 26.Rf1+ Kg8 27.Qe8+ Kh7 28.Rf8 Black resigns.
Many a wise chess teacher has said "Learn from your mistakes." This not so wise chess teacher has told her students the same thing. Do I always follow my own advice? We won't go there. However I did manage to use this very same tactic, not once but twice a few weeks later.
In the first round of CalChess State Championship I got paired against the first of four opponents under the age of 13 that I would face over the weekend. She was only 8 years old. She played very solidly and I had to wonder if I was going to cough up a 1/2 point in the very first round. I had played 27...Nf4 with the idea playing 28...Nxh3 if she didn't play 28. Kh2 or moving the knight. She played 28. a4 to reach the position below.
![]()
I took my time to make sure there was no counter play if I took the pawn on h3. Noting that I'm taking with check and can retreat to f4 afterward I play 28...Nxh3+. I'm up a pawn, but I still had a lot of work ahead of me. Just like I did in the Bob Peretz Club Championship, I had to grind out a rook and pawn ending. She offered me several draws which I turned down. She was going to have to prove to me that she could hold the ending. She couldn't hold and finally on move 65 I mated her in a queen and king ending.
I could have mated her on move 64, but I think I was fixated on avoiding stalemates and missed both moves that mate in the position below.
![]()
I missed 64...Qe2# and 64...Qc1#. Instead I played 64...Qc2. 65. Kf1 Qf2#. Good thing there wasn't a 50 move rule claim in the making. That would have been very embarrassing.
The next two games would two exercises in ugliness. The total number of moves in the two games combined was less then the number of moves played in the first round. Since neither game falls into the theme of this post I'm not bothering to show them.
In round 4 I finally get to play someone who may actually be older then me. If I had added up the ages of my first 3 opponents and multiplied by 2 the total might have come close to my age.
Once again I came across a position where I could take a "protected" pawn for free. We reached the following position after Black played 25...Re8.
![]()
Once again an advanced h pawn was just begging to be taken. The position was very similar to the one from the first round. However there were a few differences. First, there were a lot more pieces on the board. Second, at first glance it appears Black can counter with 26...Nfxd5. In reality there is no counter play for Black because moving the knight off of f6 opens up the long diagonal for White's queen. I played 26. Bxh6 expecting the game to continue 26...gxh6 27. Qxf6 and then face a long grind trying to convert the pawn advantage. Much to my surprise Black countered with 26...Nfxd5?? I had to double check and make sure I wasn't imagining things with the move 27. Qxg7# Yes it really was mate. For a change I would be the beneficiary of a very short game.
I would like to say that winning in such a manner inspired me to go 2-0 on Monday and limit the damage of my rocky 2-2 start. Monday morning I started off by hanging a pawn on move 7 because I reversed the move order. 41 moves later I squeezed out a draw against my young under rated opponent. Round 6 I still could salvage a plus 1 or even score with a win or a draw. Unfortunately I was done in by White's very active rooks and the game came to an abrupt end with my playing 40...Kh8? in the following position.
![]()
I presume my readers can do a better job of finding the mate then I did. I suppose the bright side of getting mated on move 41 was not having to try to hold the position after 40...Kf8 41. Rxg6.
The one thing I learned from this tournament is play up a section. Northern California has even more under rated kids then Southern California. However Northern California chess parents aren't psychotic like some of the Southern California chess parents I've encountered.
That's it for my chess travels for the time being. My next trip will be with the chess widower of my life. We cashed in a bunch of frequent flier miles and will be spending time in Belgium and Netherlands. Perhaps my Belgium readers can steer me to a chess cafe in Brussels or Bruge.
For the entire month of April I did not play one single game of "cracktion". Every single game I played in April was at a time limit of G/85 or slower. I played in the Bob Peretz Chess Club Championship and the Westchester Chess Club Championship. The latter just finished a couple of weeks ago. Sad to say it was nothing like the 2009 championship. Losing rounds 5 and 6 to the two guys who who end out as co-champions did not help matters.
In mid-May I ventured down to the Marshall Chess Club for the weekly "cracktion" tournament. In the first round I was paired against IM Ilye Figler. This was my 13th game against him and like 11 of my previous encounters with him, I lost. My only draw with him was back in 1997. He got the IM title last year at the NY International at the tender age of 63. Yes there is hope for those who are not under rated little munchkins. I felt like I was holding my own out of the opening. However things fell apart after I played the rather insipid move of 15...c6. Looking back at the game I don't even remember why I played the move. Was I afraid of 16. d5? More to the point, was it one of those "I don't know what to do so I'll just make a random pawn move and see what happens" moments?
Position after 15...c6?
I totally missed 16. Bxh6! I chose not to play 16...gxh6 allowing 17. Rxf6. I felt if I was going to play down a pawn against an IM I should keep the pawns around my king somewhat intact so I opted to play 16...Nh5, a move that would have been better then c6. The game continued 17.Bf4 Nxg3 18.Bxg3 Rad8 19.Rae1 Bh5 20.e5 Bg6 21.Bxg6 Nxg6 22. e6 to reach the position below.
I guess I didn't get quite get the tactical idea of deflection down the first time so I foolishly accepted the pawn he offered. 22...fxe6? 23.Qxg6 Qd5 24.Be5 Rd7 25.Rxf8+ Kxf8 26.Rf1+ Kg8 27.Qe8+ Kh7 28.Rf8 Black resigns.
Many a wise chess teacher has said "Learn from your mistakes." This not so wise chess teacher has told her students the same thing. Do I always follow my own advice? We won't go there. However I did manage to use this very same tactic, not once but twice a few weeks later.
In the first round of CalChess State Championship I got paired against the first of four opponents under the age of 13 that I would face over the weekend. She was only 8 years old. She played very solidly and I had to wonder if I was going to cough up a 1/2 point in the very first round. I had played 27...Nf4 with the idea playing 28...Nxh3 if she didn't play 28. Kh2 or moving the knight. She played 28. a4 to reach the position below.
I took my time to make sure there was no counter play if I took the pawn on h3. Noting that I'm taking with check and can retreat to f4 afterward I play 28...Nxh3+. I'm up a pawn, but I still had a lot of work ahead of me. Just like I did in the Bob Peretz Club Championship, I had to grind out a rook and pawn ending. She offered me several draws which I turned down. She was going to have to prove to me that she could hold the ending. She couldn't hold and finally on move 65 I mated her in a queen and king ending.
I could have mated her on move 64, but I think I was fixated on avoiding stalemates and missed both moves that mate in the position below.
Black to move. Mate in one.
I missed 64...Qe2# and 64...Qc1#. Instead I played 64...Qc2. 65. Kf1 Qf2#. Good thing there wasn't a 50 move rule claim in the making. That would have been very embarrassing.
The next two games would two exercises in ugliness. The total number of moves in the two games combined was less then the number of moves played in the first round. Since neither game falls into the theme of this post I'm not bothering to show them.
In round 4 I finally get to play someone who may actually be older then me. If I had added up the ages of my first 3 opponents and multiplied by 2 the total might have come close to my age.
Once again I came across a position where I could take a "protected" pawn for free. We reached the following position after Black played 25...Re8.
Once again an advanced h pawn was just begging to be taken. The position was very similar to the one from the first round. However there were a few differences. First, there were a lot more pieces on the board. Second, at first glance it appears Black can counter with 26...Nfxd5. In reality there is no counter play for Black because moving the knight off of f6 opens up the long diagonal for White's queen. I played 26. Bxh6 expecting the game to continue 26...gxh6 27. Qxf6 and then face a long grind trying to convert the pawn advantage. Much to my surprise Black countered with 26...Nfxd5?? I had to double check and make sure I wasn't imagining things with the move 27. Qxg7# Yes it really was mate. For a change I would be the beneficiary of a very short game.
I would like to say that winning in such a manner inspired me to go 2-0 on Monday and limit the damage of my rocky 2-2 start. Monday morning I started off by hanging a pawn on move 7 because I reversed the move order. 41 moves later I squeezed out a draw against my young under rated opponent. Round 6 I still could salvage a plus 1 or even score with a win or a draw. Unfortunately I was done in by White's very active rooks and the game came to an abrupt end with my playing 40...Kh8? in the following position.
After 40...Kh8? White has mate in 1.
I presume my readers can do a better job of finding the mate then I did. I suppose the bright side of getting mated on move 41 was not having to try to hold the position after 40...Kf8 41. Rxg6.
The one thing I learned from this tournament is play up a section. Northern California has even more under rated kids then Southern California. However Northern California chess parents aren't psychotic like some of the Southern California chess parents I've encountered.
That's it for my chess travels for the time being. My next trip will be with the chess widower of my life. We cashed in a bunch of frequent flier miles and will be spending time in Belgium and Netherlands. Perhaps my Belgium readers can steer me to a chess cafe in Brussels or Bruge.
Thursday, June 9, 2011
Where Do I Start?
Let's see since I got back from Victoria I've had my hands full. I got back on Tuesday April 26th. On Saturday April 30th we had our school's big Tae Twon Do tournament where I was competing in several events and also taking pictures.
The following weekend I traveled to Dallas for the National Elementary Championships. I wasn't coaching or directing. I just decided to go, hang out, possibly play in the Parents & Friends, and visit my uncle and cousin who live in Dallas. As it turned out I ended out getting work once I got down there. I took pictures and would be writing an article for Chess Life for Kids, and I also ended out coaching a private student whose regular coach had his hands full with his team. He asked me if I would work with the kid over the weekend. That worked out well for me, but my relaxing weekend ended out not being so relaxing.
I barely caught my breath from the weekend in Dallas when I get an email from the editor on Tuesday saying he needed the article that night because his typesetter was going out of the country on Thursday. How the heck was I going to pull off this feat? Normally I have plenty of time to do research, contact parents/coaches, come up with a theme and write the article. I had a flashback to my college days when I was the queen of procrastination. Quite often I would wait until the day before a term paper was due and start writing. I'd be up all night fueled by caffeine laden soda and junk food, and somehow manage to put together a paper that would give me a passing grade. (barely) In this particular case it was not procrastination it was a ultra-short deadline that I wasn't expecting.
To make a long night short, I pulled it off. I had enough information that I was able to cobble together a story that was a little light on story but loaded with pictures. After spending over an hour trying to write an introductory paragraph I finally gave up. I just started writing about each section and putting in as much information as I could about how each of the championship sections played out. I had some background info and one email address. That was enough to get things going. At 6:00 am Wednesday morning I was able to submit and article and lots of pictures. The article came out in the June issue of Chess Life for Kids. Despite the short turn around time on it, I actually thought it came out pretty well.
The club championship from hell finally came to an end, but not without more complications. We did have a clear winner, but there were a number of forfeits in round 6 and I ended out withdrawing to keep numbers even after somebody dropped out for round six. Argh! The good news is I picked up 97 rating points. The bad news is that was 3 points short of breaking 1800 for the first time since 1992. The worst news is I gave back 43 of them to under rated kids from Northern California. That tournament was the last of my three trips I made between Easter weekend and Memorial Day weekend.
That's the short version of how things have been going. I have some interesting games both good and bad. The two games I won in California were won using the same tactic that I lost to a few weeks earlier in New York City. Perhaps I finally managed to learn something from one of my losses.
Here I am in the forms competition.
A rare moment of a decent side kick.
The following weekend I traveled to Dallas for the National Elementary Championships. I wasn't coaching or directing. I just decided to go, hang out, possibly play in the Parents & Friends, and visit my uncle and cousin who live in Dallas. As it turned out I ended out getting work once I got down there. I took pictures and would be writing an article for Chess Life for Kids, and I also ended out coaching a private student whose regular coach had his hands full with his team. He asked me if I would work with the kid over the weekend. That worked out well for me, but my relaxing weekend ended out not being so relaxing.
I barely caught my breath from the weekend in Dallas when I get an email from the editor on Tuesday saying he needed the article that night because his typesetter was going out of the country on Thursday. How the heck was I going to pull off this feat? Normally I have plenty of time to do research, contact parents/coaches, come up with a theme and write the article. I had a flashback to my college days when I was the queen of procrastination. Quite often I would wait until the day before a term paper was due and start writing. I'd be up all night fueled by caffeine laden soda and junk food, and somehow manage to put together a paper that would give me a passing grade. (barely) In this particular case it was not procrastination it was a ultra-short deadline that I wasn't expecting.
To make a long night short, I pulled it off. I had enough information that I was able to cobble together a story that was a little light on story but loaded with pictures. After spending over an hour trying to write an introductory paragraph I finally gave up. I just started writing about each section and putting in as much information as I could about how each of the championship sections played out. I had some background info and one email address. That was enough to get things going. At 6:00 am Wednesday morning I was able to submit and article and lots of pictures. The article came out in the June issue of Chess Life for Kids. Despite the short turn around time on it, I actually thought it came out pretty well.
The club championship from hell finally came to an end, but not without more complications. We did have a clear winner, but there were a number of forfeits in round 6 and I ended out withdrawing to keep numbers even after somebody dropped out for round six. Argh! The good news is I picked up 97 rating points. The bad news is that was 3 points short of breaking 1800 for the first time since 1992. The worst news is I gave back 43 of them to under rated kids from Northern California. That tournament was the last of my three trips I made between Easter weekend and Memorial Day weekend.
That's the short version of how things have been going. I have some interesting games both good and bad. The two games I won in California were won using the same tactic that I lost to a few weeks earlier in New York City. Perhaps I finally managed to learn something from one of my losses.
Tuesday, May 3, 2011
Grand Pacific Open - Very Delayed Recap!
I'm alive and well despite possible rumors to the contrary. I got back to New York on Tuesday after a rather uneventful flight back from Seattle. However that's the way I like flights to be. The only excitement I like on flights are surprise upgrades or meeting someone interesting on the plane. Neither of that happened.
The ferry ride from Victoria to Seattle was eventful. We mere mortals of the tournament had the pleasure of sharing ride back with tournament winner, WGM Nino Maisuradze. She was leaving from Seattle to head back to France. We had a delightful time talking about the tournament and other things. Nino is originally from the Republic of Georgia. She knows my friend IM Rusudan Goletiani who also was from Georgia. We also celebrated Nino's perfect 6-0 score with a few bottles of wine.
The second half of my tournament was much like the first half. One win and two losses, so I finished with a 2-4 score. I didn't feel like I played horribly, but I was a little disappointed in how I handled the ending in two of the games I lost. More on my games later.
As to the rest of the winners; The biggest surprise of the tournament was the strong play of 2nd place winner, Loren Brigham Laceste. He scored 5.5. He's an upcoming junior player from Vancouver who came into the event rated 1923. He beat 3 masters including IM Lawrence Day.
Other sponsors included; Chocolaterie Bernard Callebaut who provided the chocolate Easter eggs that were at each board on Easter morning, Hotel Grand Pacific who hosted the event, MonRoi who had live game coverage on their site (you can find my rounds 4-6 games), and Bard and Banker Scottish pub where we had a get together between rounds on Sunday. Also sponsorship was provided by Imax Theatre, Orca Spirit and Downtown Victoria Business Association.
In addition to the 86 player Open section there were an additional 18 players in the Under 1400 section. The Under 1400 section was won by Leo Stokes with a perfect 6-0 score. Complete results of the tournament can be found here.
My 2-4 score wasn't worth anything in the tournament, but I scored high in the style department with my chess themed Easter outfit. I won best dressed player.
Was I glad I made a return trip to the Grand Pacific Open? Yes! Will I be back in 2011? I sure hope so. The tournament has a true European flair to it. All equipment and clocks are provided. The pairings go up well ahead of schedule. In fact the morning round pairings are posted the night before. Those who are inclined to prepare for the next round opponent can do so. The hotel is very nice and close to the ferries that come from the United States. How often can one get off a boat and walk to his or her hotel? Free Internet and free use of a fabulous health club are wonderful benefits to one's stay. My biggest complaint with many hotels is having to pay extra for Internet and use of the gym. Score one for Hotel Grand Pacific.
For anyone looking for a wonderful alternative to the usual mega-bucks weekend Swiss should really consider this tournament next year. Make a little vacation out of it by spending a few days in Seattle, Victoria or Vancouver before or after the event. Maybe we can have the Castling Queen Side tour.
Games to follow.
The ferry ride from Victoria to Seattle was eventful. We mere mortals of the tournament had the pleasure of sharing ride back with tournament winner, WGM Nino Maisuradze. She was leaving from Seattle to head back to France. We had a delightful time talking about the tournament and other things. Nino is originally from the Republic of Georgia. She knows my friend IM Rusudan Goletiani who also was from Georgia. We also celebrated Nino's perfect 6-0 score with a few bottles of wine.
Troy Pendergraft, Hanniegn & Sharon Pitre, Mike Schemm, WGM Nino Maisuradze, and moi.
Cheers!!
The second half of my tournament was much like the first half. One win and two losses, so I finished with a 2-4 score. I didn't feel like I played horribly, but I was a little disappointed in how I handled the ending in two of the games I lost. More on my games later.
Organizer Brian Raymer, WGM Nino Maisuradze, Mark S. Dutton, IA
The traditional "Show me the money!" pose.
Mark Dutton, IA and Loren Brigham Laceste
The tournament had a number of sponsors including Godesschess who gave $250 for the top five women scorers in the tournament. This was in addition to any other money women players won. The winners of those prizes were:
1st: WGM Nino Maisuradze $70 6 points
2nd: WFM Valeria Gansvind $60 4 points
3rd: WCM Alexandra Botez $50 3.5 points
4th: Sarah May $40 3.5 ponts
5th: Alice Xiao $30 3.0 points
3rd: WCM Alexandra Botez $50 3.5 points
4th: Sarah May $40 3.5 ponts
5th: Alice Xiao $30 3.0 points
Other sponsors included; Chocolaterie Bernard Callebaut who provided the chocolate Easter eggs that were at each board on Easter morning, Hotel Grand Pacific who hosted the event, MonRoi who had live game coverage on their site (you can find my rounds 4-6 games), and Bard and Banker Scottish pub where we had a get together between rounds on Sunday. Also sponsorship was provided by Imax Theatre, Orca Spirit and Downtown Victoria Business Association.
In addition to the 86 player Open section there were an additional 18 players in the Under 1400 section. The Under 1400 section was won by Leo Stokes with a perfect 6-0 score. Complete results of the tournament can be found here.
Leo Stokes, Under 1400 Champion
My 2-4 score wasn't worth anything in the tournament, but I scored high in the style department with my chess themed Easter outfit. I won best dressed player.
Polly and her "not ready for the Royal Wedding" hat.
Was I glad I made a return trip to the Grand Pacific Open? Yes! Will I be back in 2011? I sure hope so. The tournament has a true European flair to it. All equipment and clocks are provided. The pairings go up well ahead of schedule. In fact the morning round pairings are posted the night before. Those who are inclined to prepare for the next round opponent can do so. The hotel is very nice and close to the ferries that come from the United States. How often can one get off a boat and walk to his or her hotel? Free Internet and free use of a fabulous health club are wonderful benefits to one's stay. My biggest complaint with many hotels is having to pay extra for Internet and use of the gym. Score one for Hotel Grand Pacific.
For anyone looking for a wonderful alternative to the usual mega-bucks weekend Swiss should really consider this tournament next year. Make a little vacation out of it by spending a few days in Seattle, Victoria or Vancouver before or after the event. Maybe we can have the Castling Queen Side tour.
Games to follow.
Sunday, April 24, 2011
Grand Pacific Open - 1st Half
Three rounds down, and three more to go. The trip from Seattle to Victoria was much smoother then last year's trip. Literally and figuratively. The weather was beautiful so it literally was smooth sailing. We could actually see the Seattle skyline as we pulled out.
I got back in time to walk up to the super market and do some grocery shopping. I like to eat my usual type of breakfasts when I'm traveling. Cereal, milk and fresh fruit. Somebody please explain to me why I can find better organic strawberries in Canada then in the United States?
When I check into at the tournament one of the organizers told me there was another player from New York. I had seen the name on the advance entry list, but he wasn't somebody I was familiar with. He's played at The Marshall on Thursday night occasionally. However I'd never met or played him. Paul told me the he'd make sure to introduce us. However no introduction was necessary as we ended out playing each other in the very first round. What were the odds that the top half/bottom half would be such that we would actually get paired in the first round? They even used my Canadian rating instead of my USCF rating. It's a little strange seeing a rating under 1700 next to my name. It was an interesting game, but I did lose. He did out rate me by 400 points. I will post some games later. My first three rounds did not end out on the Mon Roi website. Maybe things will get working right for my last three games.
In round 2 I played one of the players who I met at the ferry in Seattle. He had recently left a comment on my blog asking when I was going to put something up about this tournament. So once again what were the odds of that happening. It was just one of those ugly games where I never quite got my pieces coordinated. I tried sac'ing pawns to free up my position, but my pieces still were a mess and I was down two pawns. I had a two choices. I could play out the agonizing position down two pawns and maybe last another hour, or I could resign and have three hours to enjoy the lovely Victoria sunshine. Unlike Bermuda when the weather sucked when I debated over an early resignation, this was a no brainer.
Space Needle - Seattle
During the trip the weather cleared up very nicely so we could actually see the mountains. There still snow on them. I don't recall actually ever getting such a nice view on past trips to Victoria.
I met a few people who were also on their way to the tournament. Last year in the chaos I had no idea if there were any chess players on the ferry or not. I did spend the time on the ferry chatting with one of the players from Portland, Oregon who was playing in this event for the first time. There are more Americans playing in the event this year. Then again there are more players period. They got over 100 players which is the most ever.
The nice thing about how the tournament is scheduled is the fact that the first round is not until 6:00 pm on Friday. The ferry from Seattle arrives in Victoria around 10:30 am which leaves a nice chunk of time to do some sightseeing before hand. I chose to do a bus tour of Victoria and a trip to the Buchart Gardens. I've visited the gardens several times before, but the flowers in April are very different then what I've seen in June visits.
Sunken Garden - Buchart Gardens
Spring flowers at Buchart Gardens
Breakfast of Champions?
I got back in time to walk up to the super market and do some grocery shopping. I like to eat my usual type of breakfasts when I'm traveling. Cereal, milk and fresh fruit. Somebody please explain to me why I can find better organic strawberries in Canada then in the United States?
When I check into at the tournament one of the organizers told me there was another player from New York. I had seen the name on the advance entry list, but he wasn't somebody I was familiar with. He's played at The Marshall on Thursday night occasionally. However I'd never met or played him. Paul told me the he'd make sure to introduce us. However no introduction was necessary as we ended out playing each other in the very first round. What were the odds that the top half/bottom half would be such that we would actually get paired in the first round? They even used my Canadian rating instead of my USCF rating. It's a little strange seeing a rating under 1700 next to my name. It was an interesting game, but I did lose. He did out rate me by 400 points. I will post some games later. My first three rounds did not end out on the Mon Roi website. Maybe things will get working right for my last three games.
In round 2 I played one of the players who I met at the ferry in Seattle. He had recently left a comment on my blog asking when I was going to put something up about this tournament. So once again what were the odds of that happening. It was just one of those ugly games where I never quite got my pieces coordinated. I tried sac'ing pawns to free up my position, but my pieces still were a mess and I was down two pawns. I had a two choices. I could play out the agonizing position down two pawns and maybe last another hour, or I could resign and have three hours to enjoy the lovely Victoria sunshine. Unlike Bermuda when the weather sucked when I debated over an early resignation, this was a no brainer.
Hotel Grand Pacific - Tournament Host Hotel and Sponsor
Provincial Government Building
Castled King Side (0-0) after Two Rounds?
What me worry?
One of the charming aspects of Victoria is that it's a very compact city. Everything is within walking distance of the hotel. Even last year, cane and all I was able to get around without much problem. This year it was even easier. There are lots of wonderful shops along Government St. How does one recover from a rough game? Retail therapy works wonders. Tea, chocolate and wine were on my shopping list.
The harbor area is it's own shopping mall with lots of local artists selling their work along the promenade that circles the harbor area. There one can find beautiful pieces of hand made jewelry, sculpture, wood carvings, prints, etc. Most everything is of high quality and pretty reasonably priced.
What would a beautiful sunny spring day be without a few street performers? Probably some folks would say "A whole lot better...." Each to their own. I have a friend from my cycling club who does street performances in sword swallowing and juggling so I always like to see how the locals compare to my friend. I like my friend's work better.
After a nice afternoon of walking around, shopping and relaxing I was ready for more chess. I finally got paired down. I guess I learned something from my painful round two loss, because I was able to inflict similar pain on my round three opponent. His pieces weren't well placed so I was able to keep him boxed in while I maneuvered my pieces around and came in on the king side. He had castled queen side, but I was able to do more damage coming in on the king side.
In the meantime on the top boards the women were coming through in fine fashion. WGM Nino Maisuradze of France and WFM Valeria Gansvind of Estonia are both 3-0. NM Alex Yam is the other 3-0. He's paired against GM Igor Rausis of the Czech Rebublic who has 2.5. The two women will be facing off in round 4. (Edit: When I first reported this I thought GM Rausis was the other 3-0. As a TD I should have figured that out because it would have made no sense having the two women playing each other if Rausis had 3 points.)
The harbor area is it's own shopping mall with lots of local artists selling their work along the promenade that circles the harbor area. There one can find beautiful pieces of hand made jewelry, sculpture, wood carvings, prints, etc. Most everything is of high quality and pretty reasonably priced.
What would a beautiful sunny spring day be without a few street performers? Probably some folks would say "A whole lot better...." Each to their own. I have a friend from my cycling club who does street performances in sword swallowing and juggling so I always like to see how the locals compare to my friend. I like my friend's work better.
After a nice afternoon of walking around, shopping and relaxing I was ready for more chess. I finally got paired down. I guess I learned something from my painful round two loss, because I was able to inflict similar pain on my round three opponent. His pieces weren't well placed so I was able to keep him boxed in while I maneuvered my pieces around and came in on the king side. He had castled queen side, but I was able to do more damage coming in on the king side.
In the meantime on the top boards the women were coming through in fine fashion. WGM Nino Maisuradze of France and WFM Valeria Gansvind of Estonia are both 3-0. NM Alex Yam is the other 3-0. He's paired against GM Igor Rausis of the Czech Rebublic who has 2.5. The two women will be facing off in round 4. (Edit: When I first reported this I thought GM Rausis was the other 3-0. As a TD I should have figured that out because it would have made no sense having the two women playing each other if Rausis had 3 points.)
WFM Valeria Gansvind WGM Nino Maisuradze
Round Four is beginning in a few minutes so I am off to see if I can even up my score. I am getting paired up again and have Black so I will have my work cut out for me. Stay tuned for further updates.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)