Tuesday, January 4, 2011

It's The Most Blunderful Time of the Year!

Cheers! Happy New Year!

A belated Happy New Year to all! It's hard to believe a year has passed so quickly. It seems like last week I was tumbling down the stairs and messing up my Christmas, New Years, and Tae Kwon Do training. Fortunately I managed to stay upright while going up and down stairs this past December. The only thing that was going down this December was my rating. Started off the month at 1731 and by the end of the month I was sitting on my floor.

Last week was the week of "lasts". Last "10 Grand Prix Points Tonight!" of 2010 on Thursday 12/30/10 and "Your Last Blunder of 2010" on 12/31/10. 9 games of cracktion in less then 24 hours. At least I had the good sense not to start off 2011 by playing in the insanity tournament at the Marshall Chess Club on 1/1/11 - 1/2/11. The thought had crossed my mind, but I didn't want to start the year totally trashed by playing 10 games of cracktion chess in the middle of the night into the wee hours of Sunday morning.

The last two days of 2010 certainly contained some interesting games for me. However like most of the year the losses out numbered the wins. The clock played a big part in most of Thursday's games. In round one I was holding my own against a 2200 until I imploded with seconds left on my clock. Round two was probably more frustrating as I totally outplayed a 1997, but couldn't finish him off because I panicked in time pressure and took a draw in the position below with two seconds left on my clock.

Black to move.

It's mate in 5, but I couldn't find it quick enough and I didn't want to lose on time. 1...Qb8+ 2. Ka6 Kc6 3. b5+ Kc7 4. b6+ Kc6 5. a5 Qb7# (I tried to hide the moves, but couldn't quite find a color that matched the background.) One of the little kids who plays on Thursday night asked me why I took a draw since it was such an easy win. It's easy when you have time, but not so easy when the clock looms large. All I saw was when I stop checking and bring my king in that the white pawns start checking my king. Taking the draw in that position was not my last blunder of the year. In fact it wasn't even my last blunder for that tournament. I would end out losing rounds 3 and 4.

My last blunder of 2010 would come on the last day of 2010. In my case maybe the tournament should be named Your Last Blunders of 2010 since I blundered more the once during the course of the tournament. It started right in round 1 as I played poorly against WIM Iryna Zenyuk (2320) and got crushed. I don't expect to win a match up like that, but I would have liked to put up a better fight. I just made the break in round 2 so I got paired down to a 1340. He offered me a draw late in the game which I turned down. Several moves later I overlooked a fork and found myself in the following position.

When he played the move 26...Ne2+ I was about to say jokingly, "Do you still want that draw?" But before I could even ask the stupid question, he offers me a draw. I was rather stunned and asked "Why?" He was afraid of the time difference on the clock and felt he couldn't win it with the time he had. Sound familiar? However he had 01:49 on the clock to my 09:27. That seems like ages especially in comparison to the 2 seconds I had on Thursday. I considered turning down the draw because I really didn't deserve it. However he wasn't acting like my "not so secret admirer" who just can't stand the idea of winning against me. He really didn't feel like he had the time to win the position. I did accept the draw offer, but told him he should have played it out. I guess this draw was payback for Thursday's draw.

Walking into that fork was not my last or biggest blunder of the tournament. That came in round 3 against Guy Colas. He clearly has my number even though our ratings are usually within 50 points of each other. We've played 33 times and he's beaten me 22 times. Usually he gets me on the clock. He tends to play much faster then me, so often our games have come down to my flagging or imploding in time pressure. The clock was not a factor in this game. I can't even blame it on losing focus or getting overconfident. In one of my rare moments of wanting to sac something, I chose to sac the wrong piece. The position below just screams "Sac something to bust open the position!"

Position after 23...f4

I spent a lot of time on my 24th move trying to work out the attack I would have after 24. Rxg7. I think I was imaging that somehow I would end out picking off the h pawn with my queen and threatening Qg7#. After he played 24...Kxg7 I realized my imagined scenario was not going to occur and that the best I would get was getting the rook back for the bishop and be up two pawns. Instead of settling for that variation with 25. Bh6+ Kg8 26. Bxf8 Qxf8 27. Rxe6, I chose 25. Qh6+. I figured after 25...Kg8 26. Rxe6 Rxe6 27. Qxe6+ Kh8 28. Bf6+ Rxf6 29. Qxf6+ Kg8 30. Qxf4 I would be in a queen and pawn ending up 3 pawns with his king wide open. I completely overlooked that after 26. Rxe6 he doesn't have to recapture with 26...Rxe6. Instead he plays 26...Qf5! I saw that he's attacking my rook a second time, but totally missed that the queen is also hitting b1. Attempting to sac the bishop with 24. Bh6 was what I should have played. Coulda, shoulda, woulda......

Here's the entire game.


Since my mistake was not due to the usual overconfidence or lack of focus issues I didn't beat up on myself. Instead I joked with Guy and said "I think your son is rubbing off on me." His son had played a game recently where he had sac'ed a rook in a position he was winning and ended out losing. Although I clearly had blundered I was satisfied with the fact that I had tried to be aggressive and not play like a chicken.

I bounced back with a win in round four against a grossly under rated high school kid. His rating on the wallchart was posted as 790. That was a very old rating from 2009 and since then he has been playing again and has a rating of 1100. He played much better then that rating, and it was not an easy win. However it was a win, and after an ugly loss I often fall apart for the remainder of the tournament.

In the last round I was paired against a 1750. I was a little surprised I was playing someone so close to me in rating, but there was no one else lower then me who I had not already played. A win would give me an even score, but wouldn't lead to any rating gain. My year would end as it started with me sitting on my floor.

After I made my 12th move my last round opponent got up and left the room with his clock running. I thought that was a bit odd given the short time control of G/30. I used the moment to go to the bathroom since that's something I generally don't want to have to do during time pressure. I noticed he was staring at the wallchart. I assumed that he was trying to figure out if he could win money or not. It certainly had not entered my mind that I might possibly win money in this tournament. I was just licking my wounds and recover my pride after the round three ugliness.

When I came back from the bathroom he pointed out his move and said "I offer you a draw." That kind of surprised me. I'm used to lower rated kids offering me early draws, but not slightly higher rated adults. It was tempting to go out and look at the wallchart, but I didn't want to make it obvious that I suspected why he was offering the draw. Instead I said "I'd think about it." I'm not sure why I even said that since on general principles I refuse early draw offers. I played my move, went out and looked at the wallchart. Now I could see why he wanted the draw. A draw would give him the Under 1800 prize. If I won I would get the under 1800 prize. A draw would not help me since he had 2 points and I had 1.5. I had to play for a win.

Playing for a win when I'm Black and the opponent is playing very safe is hard. I kept trying to avoid trades and come up with some kind of play. I did miss a chance to win a pawn. Even then it's not an easy win, but it certainly would have given me better chances. He did finally get his draw and the Under 1800 prize. Here is that game.


At least 2010 ended with something besides a loss. 2011 started with a win last night. I filled in for one round. At the moment I can say I'm undefeated for 2011. Give me a few days and that will probably no longer be the case. Who knows where my chess journeys will take me in 2011. Last year I did not play in any new states. I can't count Victoria, British Columbia as a new state. Perhaps this year I can add a state or two to my quest to play all 50. Hawaii and Alaska would be good choices. However it's more likely I'll play some states a little closer to home.


BlunderProne said...

Like Minds... I made a post of a similar title a couple weeks ago:


Polly said...

I promise I didn't steal your title. In fact I've been out of the blog loop for awhile and need to go do some catching up with everyone. I'm afraid people think I've vanished from the blogosphere,

chesstiger said...

Polly is alive!

I thought you were kicking and screaming with your martial art to get a second black belt.

But here you are again with a blunder post. Same old, same old, as if nothing has changed. :-)

Glad to hear you are undefeated in 2011. Keep up the good work!

Btw, the phrase "sitting on my floor" is a bit weird for europeans. I wondered what happened with your chair.

LinuxGuy said...

Lots of games, so I'll just comment on the diagrams for now.

Diagram 1, you can check him to the side with your queen or move your rook anywhere along the rank. Let's say he checks you, Ke4, then brings his rook up and ultimately trades rooks without dropping a pawn even. Best White can probably do is to stalemate him/herself, lest White get into zugzwang and lose.

Diagram 2, poor clock management.

Diagram 3, I first spent as much as 2 minutes on Rxg7, then looked at Rxe6, Bxf4, Bf6, IOW identifying/considering all of the candidate moves before the "aha" of finding Bh6, and if ..Re7, then b4 removing it's defender should be good enough (may even be another move there that also works).

So I would have been able to play Bh6 within around 8 minutes, but as you can see I identified and looked at the candidate moves to get there. It is worthwhile to practice solving combination problems to be able to do this OTB, since online is usually not enough time, nor is blitzing at the end! ;-)

Polly said...

Tiger: I am alive and kicking. Yes, some things do not change. Another blunder post. Hopefully you're not bored with them.

As I've explained before the US rating system has what is called a floor where one's rating can not drop below a certain point. The system does have its flaws, but we live with it.

Linux: I had actually considered Bh6, but didn't feel like it would draw the king out, and I couldn't see what I would do if he didn't take. Re7 forced him to take, but unfortunately I didn't follow through correctly.

Tactics training is definitely called for if I want to find the right moves in positions like #1 and #3.

#2 was a matter of over focusing on the opponent coming to d3 with the knight and totally missing e2.

LinuxGuy said...

Polly, I see what you did now in diagram 3, forgot about the back-rank mate threat.

The problem with combinations as they are usually presented, for example flip through any Chess Life and look at some tournament games. Of course they want to "show off" their combos so they always want to show the ones with the most blatant disregard for safety, the most bragadocious looking combos (never-mind that I believe that a lot of these combos shouldn't even work, and come with scanty analysis - for example, some games from the "juniors" tournaments.)

This is wrong, most combos involve safety, even as one is making a true sac or a sham-sac.

One thing about the Bh6 line is that if ...Rg8, then Rxe6 wins the pawn. Let's say ..Qf5 then, now Bxg7+..Rxg7, Re6xRe8+ wins.

Missing the back-rank threat was tough, but the other part of ..Qf5 was that it covered g6, so there was no longer any kind of drawing-sac on that square with the Re6.

If you try and solve combinations or tactics from a book, your rating should go up as you are already doing well with the openings, positionally, and have lots of playing experience.

Anonymous said...

That photo made me think of that other you posted from when you were a child studying chess on the couch. Have you ever thought of recreating that same pose and photoshopping them side by side? That'd be awesome!

Polly said...

Anon: I can't say I have thought of that.